🔗 Share this article

Perhaps the most iconic photographs from the twentieth century portrays an unclothed young girl, her hands spread wide, her face distorted in terror, her skin blistered and flaking. She can be seen fleeing towards the lens as running from an airstrike within the Vietnam War. Beside her, additional kids also run from the destroyed village of Trảng Bàng, with a scene featuring thick fumes along with troops.

This International Effect of an Single Picture

Just after the distribution in the early 1970s, this picture—originally titled The Terror of War—became a traditional hit. Witnessed and debated by millions, it's broadly hailed for motivating worldwide views opposing the US war in Vietnam. A prominent thinker afterwards commented how this deeply unforgettable image of the young the subject suffering likely did more to fuel global outrage against the war compared to extensive footage of shown atrocities. A legendary English documentarian who covered the conflict described it the ultimate photograph from what would later be called the televised conflict. A different veteran photojournalist stated that the photograph stands as simply put, a pivotal photographs ever taken, particularly from that conflict.

The Long-Standing Attribution Followed by a New Claim

For over five decades, the photograph was attributed to a South Vietnamese photographer, an emerging South Vietnamese photographer working for a major news agency in Saigon. But a provocative latest film released by a global network argues that the iconic image—long considered to be the apex of photojournalism—might have been shot by a different man on the scene during the attack.

As claimed by the investigation, The Terror of War was actually photographed by an independent photographer, who offered his work to the organization. The claim, and the film’s following inquiry, began with an individual called a former photo editor, who claims that the influential editor directed the staff to reassign the photo's byline from the stringer to Nick Út, the sole employed photographer there at the time.

The Investigation for the Real Story

The former editor, currently elderly, contacted a filmmaker in 2022, seeking support in finding the unnamed stringer. He mentioned how, should he still be alive, he wished to give a regret. The filmmaker reflected on the independent photojournalists he worked with—likening them to the stringers of today, who, like independent journalists in that era, are routinely ignored. Their work is often challenged, and they function amid more challenging conditions. They have no safety net, they don’t have pensions, minimal assistance, they frequently lack proper gear, and they remain extremely at risk while photographing within their homeland.

The filmmaker pondered: Imagine the experience for the individual who made this photograph, should it be true that he was not the author?” As an image-maker, he thought, it could be deeply distressing. As a student of photojournalism, especially the vaunted documentation of Vietnam, it could prove reputation-threatening, maybe reputation-threatening. The respected history of the image within Vietnamese-Americans was so strong that the filmmaker who had family emigrated in that period felt unsure to take on the project. He expressed, “I didn’t want to disrupt the established story attributed to Nick the photograph. And I didn’t want to change the status quo within a population that had long respected this success.”

This Search Unfolds

But the two the investigator and his collaborator concluded: it was worth raising the issue. When reporters must hold others responsible,” remarked the investigator, it is essential that we can address tough issues of ourselves.”

The documentary documents the team while conducting their own investigation, including eyewitness interviews, to public appeals in today's Ho Chi Minh City, to reviewing records from other footage taken that day. Their efforts lead to a candidate: Nguyễn Thành Nghệ, working for a news network at the time who occasionally worked as a stringer to foreign agencies independently. As shown, an emotional the man, now also elderly and living in California, states that he provided the photograph to the news organization for a small fee and a copy, yet remained troubled by not being acknowledged for decades.

The Backlash Followed by Further Scrutiny

He is portrayed in the film, quiet and reflective, but his story became controversial within the community of war photography. {Days before|Shortly prior to